From a useful topic to a draft your team can review.
- Topic and sources selected
- Draft prepared for review
- Your team approves publication
Inspect an example
- Input
- An approved topic about preparing for a trekking trip, with current source information.
- Output
- A draft appears in the review queue. The responsible person checks facts and edits it; publication waits for that approval.
- STARTING SCOPE
- One content format, one review process and an agreed publication route.
- IMPLEMENTATION
- Fixed quote after intake
One task, clearly defined.
Your team knows the subject, but collecting ideas, drafting and coordinating reviews takes time. We connect one content process: approved inputs, a draft in your tone, and a named reviewer before anything is published.
Topic and sources selected
Draft prepared for review
Your team approves publication
A draft appears in the review queue. The responsible person checks facts and edits it; publication waits for that approval.
Nothing is published until your team approves it.
Agree the boundaries before building.
Included in the agreed setup
- A briefing and source format for one content type
- Drafts based on your information and tone
- A review queue with explicit approval before publishing
- One agreed export or publishing connection
Outside the starting scope
- Unreviewed publishing or invented customer stories and results
- Guaranteed rankings, traffic or an unlimited editorial service
What we need from you
- Your audience, editorial rules and approved information
- Examples of the tone and content you want
- A reviewer and access to the agreed publishing tool
See the Toubkal content workflow
The case describes a content workflow with drafts reviewed in Notion. Traffic, lead and time-saving results are not yet established in the case.
Know what you buy. Know what follows.
A short intake checks your tools, data and scope. If the process is clear, we quote directly. Uncertain processes or complex access rules may need a paid analysis first, agreed with you.
Fixed quote after intake
Configuration, agreed connections, test cases and handoff. The quote names the deliverables, timeline, review rounds and acceptance criteria.
Software and consumption
Hosting, licences and AI usage are itemised. We agree what is included, the volume limits and the cost of going beyond them before you sign.
Support with clear limits
Handoff, follow-up and ongoing maintenance are scoped per solution. Your quote names included checks and changes, support time, response windows and the start of billing.
Accounts and the delivered work are handed over as agreed. Any third-party platform licences and portability limits are named in the proposal.
Before you decide.
Does the content assistant publish on its own?
No. Drafts land in a review queue, and nothing is published until the responsible person approves it. That reviewer checks facts and edits the text; publication waits for the approval. The setup covers one content format, one review process and one agreed export or publishing connection. Unreviewed publishing is outside the scope.
Will the drafts sound like us, and stick to the facts?
Drafts are based on your information, audience and editorial rules, and on examples of the tone you want. We agree a briefing and source format for one content type, so every draft starts from approved material. Invented customer stories or results are excluded, and the reviewer checks the facts before anything goes out. The Toubkal case describes a content workflow with drafts reviewed before publication.
Does it guarantee more traffic or better rankings?
No. We do not guarantee rankings or traffic, and the assistant is not an unlimited editorial service. It prepares drafts for one agreed content format, so your team spends its time on review instead of first drafts. To see how visible your site is to AI search engines today, run the free GEO scan.
Tell us about the task.
Your chosen solution is already selected in the contact form.